| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reproductive allocation | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Optimality models as tools In previous research, we have empirically measured the growth, survival, preference, or movement responses of individuals and used these empirical estimates to define rates in our models. Now we are working toward understanding what drives these individual responses. As a result, we have been developing and using optimality models (dynamic programming models, in particular) as tools to help understand how or why particular behaviors or patterns in nature may exist. Our Energy Allocation and Parental Care research have relied heavily on these models. In addition, we are linking models of optimal behavior with individual-based simulation models. This is a promising approach to answering questions in ecology and resource management. With this approach, we can explore population-level consequences of individual decisions and life-history traits. | Dr. Elizabeth Marschall Home page | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Energy allocation Garvey, J. E. and E. A. Marschall. 2003. Understanding latitudinal trends in fish body size through models of optimal seasonal energy allocation [abstract]. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 60: 938-948. For fish at high latitudes, short growing seasons should constrain size-at-age, although the converse often occurs. We used a dynamic state variable model to find energy allocation strategies to length, fat, and Bunnell, D. B. and E. A. Marschall. 2003. Optimal energy allocation to ovaries after spawning. Evolutionary Ecology Research 5: 439457. For iteroparous organisms in which fecundity is positively related to body size, a trade-off exists between allocation of energy to gonads, thus ensuring some reproductive output, and allocation to somatic growth, thus increasing potential fecundity in the future. This tradeoff can influence several life-history patterns, including when, for organisms that grow after maturity, allocation to gonads begins following the previous reproductive event. White crappie Pomoxis annularis, a spring-spawning freshwater fish, began allocating energy to ovaries in autumn at the expense of continued somatic growth and higher potential fecundity. Within five populations, the amount of early allocation varied between years. We combined dynamic programming with an individual-based model to determine how summer and spring feeding conditions interact to influence when allocation to reproduction should begin. Model results indicated that autumn allocation to ovaries was in response to future spring feeding conditions rather than recent summer feeding conditions. At least a 10% probability of poor spring feeding conditions resulted in ovary investment patterns that matched field observations. The model was unable to explain the inter-annual variation in autumn energy observed in the field. Early allocation of energy to ovaries is probably an evolutionary adaptation to the possibility of poor spring feeding conditions. Seasonal patterns in energy allocation across latitudes and life histories [project page]. (Joe Beuchel, M.S. student, D.D. Aday, and E.A. Marschall). Using a combination of empirical measurements and optimality models, we are examining how latitudinal and seasonal differences in environmental conditions affect energy allocation in fish with different reproductive strategies. Crappie (Pomoxis spp.) spawn once in the spring each year while bluegill (Lepomis macrochirus) spawn multiple times over the course of a long spawning season in the summer. Previous work has suggested that seasonal patterns of energy allocation in crappie are driven by the need to build gonads well in advance of the spawning season. Our currently limited empirical data on patterns in gonadal size in bluegills suggest a much more rapid development of gonadal tissue, allowing them to spawn repeatedly through the summer.
Parental care decisions Mauck, R. A., E. A. Marschall, and P. G. Parker. 1999. Interaction of adult survival and uncertainty of paternity in parental care decisions [abstract]. The American Naturalist 154:99-109. We generally assume that males deciding whether to provide parental care to offspring should consider probable relatedness of offspring, but we often ignore the importance of knowing the reliability of these estimates of probable relatedness. Using a dynamic programming model, we show that too little annual variation (which should lead to great certainty in estimates) of extra-pair fertilization (EPF) rates or too much annual variation combined with low precision of estimates of EPF rate (i.e., low certainty) should both lead to little effect of EPF rate on male parental care decisions. At intermediate levels of certainty, these decisions should be driven by relative present/future trade-offs. Most striking, adult survival rate has the greatest influence on male decisions such that, for any given cost of reproduction and value of male care, tolerance of EPFs decreases as adult survival increases. Steinhart, G.B., E.E. Dunlop, M.S. Ridgway, and E.A. Marschall. (ongoing). Should I stay or should I go: optimal parental care decisions of a nest-guarding fish. Smallmouth bass in Lake Erie have recently experienced a combination of selection pressures that are quite different from those
Maternal Effects We have begun to expect the existence of maternal effects (offspring traits that are correlated with environmentally induced phenotypic traits of mothers) in our studies of fish recruitment. We now include the phenomenon of maternal effects in studies of yellow perch and walleye in Lake Erie. Both of these studies are aimed at understanding 1) differences in parental (both maternal and paternal) attributes among spawning stocks and 2) relative contributions of each spawning stock to the lakewide population of each species. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||